Updated: Nov. 28, 2001. Copyright © 2000 by Walt W McNab, Concord, CA, U.S.A.. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
MULTISPECIES REACTIVE TRANSPORT IN GROUND WATER |
|
|
Senior
Scientist Exponent-Failure Analysis Associates Oakland, California |
![]()
TOPIC A: BASIC PROCESSES AND EQUATIONS
The ability to understand, and, therefore, to predict the evolution of chemical contamination of an aquifer requires the knowledge of:
Flow and transport processes.
Chemical interactions between dissolved
constituents and the solid phase.
Coupling between the transport and the
chemical processes.
The latter---namely, transport in the presence of chemical reactions-- is often referred to as
reactive transport. Reactive transport plays a key role in a variety of problems that may face the hydrologist (and/or environmental scientist or engineer), who deals with subsurface contamination. Such problems include, among others, the fate of petroleum hydrocarbon and chlorinated hydrocarbon plumes under different biogeochemical regimes, as well as the immobilization of trace metal contaminants in response to adsorption and precipitation reactions. Moreover, aside from practical interests in aquifer contamination, reactive transport concepts are central to the understanding of natural processes the subsurface. These processes may include:
Formation of hydrothermal mineral deposits.
Diagenesis of sedimentary materials.
Chemical weathering phenomena.
Various soil formation processes.
![]()
(Comment: Even in the one or two paragraphs above, you have, no doubt, encountered a number of terms, e.g., "adsorption and precipitation", with which you may not be familiar. Do not worry. I have explained some of them in a glossary. To get to the glossary, click on underlined blue words. Iíll return to most terms in detail, later in the course).
From a computational point of view, simulations of reactive transport processes may range from relatively simple approaches, such as solving the transport equation with an appropriate retardation term, to the simulation of complex, multispecies models that couple transport with different types of chemical reactions.
via the World Wide Web for use on a PC,
running Windows 95/98/NT.

A couple of very simple examples (that will be expanded upon and investigated in a subsequent lecture) illustrate some of the issues involved in reactive transport.
Acid
mine drainage. The phenomenon of acid mine drainage is
a significant environmental issue at many locations, especially where
sulfide-bearing mine tailings are exposed at ground surface, allowing
percolating rainwater to react with the tailings. This may produce sulfuric
acid, lower the pH of water in underlying aquifers, mobilize metals, and induce
a variety of mineral precipitation and dissolution reactions.
Consider, for example, the simplified hypothetical scenario depicted in
Figure 1. A pile of mining waste containing pyrite (FeS2)
is exposed to rainwater that is in equilibrium with atmospheric oxygen.
Sulfide is unstable in the presence of dissolved oxygen (at least
according to an equilibrium thermodynamic model) and will convert to sulfate.
This reaction produces sulfuric acid, which dissociates and release protons
(H+) and sulfate ion (SO42-)
into the aquifer. The influx of these species into the underlying aquifer may
lead to a host of changes in
process) from clays
as a result of displacement by protons.

Modeling the
reactive transport (i.e., transport accompanied by chemical reactions) involved in the acid mine drainage problem outlined above, requires:
A transport model for all of the dissolved species of interest in the system (e.g., Fe2+, Ca2+, SO42-, H+), and
A geochemical speciation model to quantify the partitioning of components (e.g., Fe, Ca, S) between phases (e.g., FeS2, Fe(OH)3, CaCO3, CaSO4…2H2O) according to equilibrium and kinetic constraints. The source/sink term in the transport equation provides the link between the two processes.
Fuel Hydrocarbon Biodegradation
. As a second example, consider the release of a petroleum hydrocarbon, such as gasoline, from a leaking underground fuel tank into an underlying aquifer (Figure 2).
Relatively soluble components of the gasoline mixture, such as toluene (C7H8), will dissolve into groundwater underneath the tank location. This substance, the toluene, will then serve as an energy source for microorganisms that are always present in the subsurface. Such organisms require an oxidizing agent to convert hydrocarbons into CO2 energy. The most favorable oxidizing agent from a thermodynamic viewpoint is dissolved oxygen (O2). Once all the dissolved O2 is depleted, other oxidizing agents (alternatively called electron acceptors) may be used by the microorganisms. As illustrated on the Figure 2, these may include ferric iron (contained in the solid phase, such as iron oxyhydroxides), sulfate, and even CO2 itself via the process of methanogenesis. These reactions may lead to biogeochemical zonation within the aquifer, where different aqueous species are found in different areas and local-scale mineral precipitation and dissolution reactions occur in response to changes in aquifer chemistry.
Although the oxidation-reduction (
redox) reactions presented in this example are, in reality, entirely mediated by microorganisms (i.e., biotransformation reactions), the use of reactive transport models, based on equilibrium thermodynamics, for modeling aqueous speciation may yield important insights into the behavior of such systems. Moreover, kinetic (i.e., reaction rate) constraints may be imposed on the reactions to capture some of the effects of the actions of microorganisms on a macro-scale, so that simulations may closely match field observations in many instances.
In particular, it is possible to capture the two-way coupling between aquifer chemistry and the rates of the oxidation reactions. This statement is based on the observation that, often, rates of biotransformation reactions slow down as the system becomes more chemically reducing, perhaps reflecting in part the decrease in energy yield.
![]()
The core of any model that describes phenomena of flow, transport, and transformation of any extensive quantity in a porous medium domain is the balance equation of that quantity (The mass balance equation for a specified chemical species is referred to as
transport equation, or advection-dispersion equation). Obviously, the balance equation constitutes only part of the model that describes the transport of the considered extensive quantity. . The complete model includes also flux equations (for the considered extensive quantity), constitutive relations, various definitions, and initial and boundary conditions. If you are not familiar with the methodology of constructing models of flow and transport in porous medium domain, go to the appropriate literature, or take an appropriate course. Take a look at the course on MODELING GROUND WATER FLOW AND CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT. This is also a self-study computer mediated distance learning course offered by CMDL E&T. In what follows Iíll assume that you are familiar with balance equations, their structure and how to construct them for flow and transport problems of interest.
model
of the considered problem.
![]()
The mass balance equation of species
i in an aqueous phase (a liquid in which the dominant chemical species is water, H2O) of (approximately) constant density, takes the form:
in which
ci denotes the concentration (mass per unit volume of solution) of the i-th species. The source term, Gi, represents the strength of the source of the i-th species (i.e., the rate of increase of mass of the i-th species per unit volume of solution, with a negative source representing a sink), V denotes the velocity of the solution (here, the aqueous phase), D denotes the sum of the coefficients of dispersion and of molecular diffusion in porous medium, and f denotes the porosity.
reactions, and radioactive decay. All these are processes that occur within the aqueous phase.
Heterogeneous reactions, or processes that involve interactions between components in the aqueous phase and constituents of the solid phase, or transfer across interphase boundaries within the void space. Examples include equilibration reactions between aqueous species and mineral phases (involving precipitation or dissolution), adsorption and desorption phenomena, and ion exchange.
Reactions of either type that contribute to the overall source term G i may be described by using equilibrium or kinetic models. In equilibrium models the concentrations of the multiple species are simultaneously adjusted within the aqueous phase in accordance with equilibrium relationships and mass balance constraints. Such models are appropriate when the rates of reactions are relatively rapid (in comparison with other transport and transformation mechanisms). For example, equilibrium models are appropriate for the description of complexation or ion exchange reactions. In other situations, when reaction rates are relatively slow, kinetic models (i.e., models which consider reaction progress as a function of time) may be more appropriate. For example, kinetic models provide better descriptions of mineral precipitation and dissolution reactions, as well as of many redox reactions. Assumptions involving the use of equilibrium models or kinetic models for different problems may exert profound influences on the behavior of simulated systems and will be explored in detail later in the course.

The issue of handling the mathematical coupling of the source term in the mass balance equation with the chemical reaction equations is an important consideration for reactive transport models. We often distinguish between two types of models:
the fully-coupled
models and those based on the
two-step
approach.
For each time step in the numerical simulation, fully-coupled models solve all of the transport and reaction equations simultaneously, whereas the two-step approach involves the separate solution of the transport and chemical reaction equations over small times steps, with or without iteration between the two. The advantages and disadvantages of the two modeling approaches will be considered in subsequent lectures.
![]()
Once the contaminant hydrologist gains an understanding of reactive transport modeling and how it may be used to solve practical and theoretical problems of interest, it is important that some basic issues be brought to mind as each new situation is being encountered. These may include:
For the transport model alone, many of the classical numerical modeling issues, that are familiar to solute transport modeling, such as the adequacy of time and space discretization to assure a reasonably accurate solution.
For the chemical speciation model, assumptions concerning the selection of species in the modeled system (i.e., are all of the relevant species being considered), reaction kinetics, and the accuracy of the thermodynamic database.
Information concerning the solid phase. For example, are the compositions and distributions of important mineral phases in the modeled system accurately known?
Beyond these basic issues, the modeler must always be aware that the capabilities of reactive transport models may, under many circumstances, greatly exceed the capability of field investigators to properly characterize the system, either physically or geochemically. As such, the modeler must carefully assess the purpose of performing the modeling in each instance, as it is often an expensive endeavor. In other words, the value of reactive transport models for true predictive purposes, or for simply comparing scenarios under admittedly idealized conditions, must be examined. With these issues in mind, we shall proceed into the next series of lectures, which will introduce the mathematical components of reactive transport models. We shall then proceed to the example problems.
![]()
You are now ready to continue to LECTURE 2: Mass Balance, Mass Action, and Charge Balance Equations for Multiple Species.
![]()
You may e-mail me questions and comments.
Walt W. McNab
E-mail address: Walt McNab <WaltMcNab@prodigy.net>