Updated: May 20, 2001. Copyright © 2000 by Jacob Bear, Haifa, Israel. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
MODELING GROUNDWATER FLOW AND CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT |
|
|
Professor EmeritusFaculty of Civil EngineeringTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifa 32000, Israel
|
![]()
In the first two lectures of this topic, we have discussed:
Classification
of Aquifers.
Earlier, we have stated that our role, as geohydrologists, is to
predict the behavior of an aquifer system, in response to any natural (e.g.,
natural recharge from precipitation), or man-made (e.g., pumping) excitations.
Essentially, the relationship between excitation and response takes the form of
a water balance. A water balance is a very simple and obvious
concept: given any spatial domain, the difference between all inflows and
outflows during any specified period of time -- the balance period -- is stored
in that domain. In hydrology of groundwater, we consider two possible domains: ![]()
![]()
A
very small domain (infinitesimally small) surrounding a given point within an
aquifer domain. We really think of a "point in space".
Similarly, we may consider two possible balance periods:
![]()
An
infinitesimally small time interval. In the latter case, we really think of a "point
in time".
Later in the course, we shall give an interpretation of what we mean by "a water balance for a point in a spatial domain and at a point in time".
![]()
![]()

As a case of particular interest, we shall consider aquifer domains, basing our discussion on the concept of essentially horizontal flow, to be presented in detail in
TOPIC C: MOTION EQUATIONS, and LECTURE 3: Aquifer Transmissivity.The groundwater part of the hydrological cycle was presented in
Topic A, Lecture 1. The figure there schematically describes the entire hydrological cycle.![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
The difference between total inflow and total outflow of water and of pollutants during any selected period is stored in (or removed from) the aquifer, causing a rise (or drop) in water levels and in the concentration of pollutants, respectively.
![]()
The boundaries of a considered aquifer domain may be
the
natural boundaries of a groundwater basin (e.g., an impervious boundary, a
water divide, or a river fully penetrating an aquifer), or
any closed
boundary drawn on a map (say, for administrative reasons).
In the present lecture, we shall use some of the aquifer concepts and definitions that we intend to discuss in detail in later lectures, assuming that you are familiar with them, at least in a general way, from previous studies, reading, or work.
![]()


LECTURE 3:
REGIONAL GROUNDWATER BALANCE
We consider an aquifer, or part of it, and we wish to establish a groundwater balance for it. There is no need for much discussion in order to reach the conclusion that such a balance may take the form:

All terms in this equation are expressed as volume of water per the balance period, where the balance period may be a year, a season, 3 months, etc.
Most of these balance components are obvious and need no further discussion. Let us focus only on some of them.
A. INFLOW AND OUTFLOW THROUGH AQUIFER BOUNDARIES
![]()
Water may also enter an aquifer from a river or a lake that serves as its boundary. We shall discuss this case in a later lecture, where we shall discuss boundary conditions.
The figure below shows a contour map and a portion of an aquifer, ABCD, for which a water balance is being established. (green) Arrows indicate inflow and outflow. Groundwater flows into the aquifer through the boundary segments DA and AB, and leaves it through the segments BC and CD. Recall that we are assuming here two-dimensional flow in the horizontal plane.

Inflow and outflow through aquifer boundaries
QUESTION 1: Study the figure. Do you agree with the statement "Groundwater flows into the aquifer through the boundary segments DA and AB, and leaves it through the segments BC and CD"?
How do we calculate net inflow into a specified domain?
![]()

Similarly, the
transmissivity along the j-th segment is represented by an average value, Tj, over that segment. The inflow through Wj is then given by the productWj
¥ Tj ¥ JnjWe may then sum such expressions for the entire boundary, with a positive value of
Jnj for inflow and a negative one for outflow. We obtain
This expression provides the instantaneous net inflow through the aquifer boundaries.
In
general, the instantaneous net inflow may vary with time. Denoting the average
net inflow during 
![]()
We shall discuss solute balances in later lectures.
B. LEAKAGE INTO AND OUT OF AN AQUIFER
As in the discussion on the previous balance component, do not worry if AT THIS TIME you do not understand the mathematical expression that I shall present for the leakage term. We shall come to this topic at a later lecture, and then I'll call your attention to the material presented here.
We are discussing the case in which the considered portion of an aquifer is overlain, and/or underlain by an aquitard. We have already introduced the term
aquitard to denote a layer that overlies or underlies an aquifer, provided it is characterized by:![]()
![]()
The leakage,
qv (= volume of water that leaks per unit horizontal area and per unit time) through a semi-permeable layer (or an aquitard) from an overlying (or an underlying) aquifer, in which the piezometric head is hext into the aquifer, where the piezometric head is h, is given by:
In Eq. (4),
K' is the hydraulic conductivity of the aquitard, and B' is its thickness.The figure below shows the general case of leakage from one aquifer to an overlying or underlying aquifer. The leakage is driven by the piezometric head difference
h2-h1, across the resistance B'/K',
where
K' and B' are the hydraulic conductivity and the thickness, respectively, of the semipervious layer. If qv as calculated by Eqn. (4) is negative, we have leakage out of the aquifer.
As leakage
may vary from point to point, we may divide the (horizontal) area of the
aquitard into elementary areas,
D
t S(i) (DAi <qvi>).
As we
lower the piezometric head in a pumped aquifer, the leakage may reverse its
direction from outflow to inflow.
The remarks made above with respect to inflow and outflow of pollutants, which now are carried with the leaking water, are valid also here.
C. NATURAL REPLENISHMENT FROM PRECIPITATION
Phreatic
aquifers can be replenished, or recharged, from above by precipitation falling
directly over the ground surface overlying the aquifer, provided the ground
surface is sufficiently pervious. Part of the area may be almost completely
impervious (e.g., covered by houses, streets, highways, or an impervious rock or
topsoil which is practically impervious) and does not contribute to the natural
replenishment of the aquifer beneath it.
It is
well known that with the expansion of urbanization, highways, parking lots,
etc., the area available for infiltration is reduced. A larger fraction of the
precipitation is diverted to the rainfall drainage system. It may still be used
downstream as surface water (e.g., in rivers and lakes), but the amount of
natural replenishment reaching an underlying aquifer is certainly reduced.
Confined
aquifers are replenished by groundwater inflow from an adjacent phreatic aquifer
which, in turn, is replenished from precipitation (e.g.. aquifers B and C in the
cross-section shown in the
The relationship between natural replenishment and total precipitation is governed, among others, by the following factors:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Moreover, in general,
![]()
![]()
we are not interested in the variability in infiltration during any individual rain event (= storm), and not even that resulting from all the storms during a year, taking each storm as an instantaneous pulse. For most regional management purposes, we are interested only in annual or seasonal replenishment. Here, "season", which could mean 2-6 months, is used as a time unit in the management model.
Within the framework of management models, we often assume that the natural replenishment is uniformly distributed throughout the year, or throughout the rainy season. In certain cases, where more details are required, monthly averages are used.
Several methods are available for estimating natural replenishment from annual or seasonal precipitation data. Note the use of the term "estimating", rather than "determining", to emphasize that, in view of the complexity of the subject, one can expect at most to derive an estimate of the replenishment, rather than any precise value. This fact will become clearer as we learn more about the complexity and uncertainty associated with any investigation related to groundwater.
We shall mention two methods for estimating aquifer replenishment:
![]()
![]()
Relationship between replenishment and precipitation This is an obvious, almost "natural", approach, as
precipitation is the source of replenishment. Also, in general, much more data
is available on precipitation, than, say, on water levels -- input required in
any application of an inverse method. The idea is based on the observation that
except for precipitation that varies from one year to the next, all other
factors which affect replenishment (see list presented above) are constant in
time (except antecedent conditions when considering infiltration from an
individual rain event), or vary only gradually (e.g., due to changes in land
use). Hence, rather than refer to annual replenishment as the
unknown parameter, the natural replenishment is often first related to
precipitation, for which a sufficient amount of data is usually available. One
way is to assume that annual or seasonal infiltration, or replenishment, is a
certain percentage of the annual, or seasonal precipitation. It is simple, but
not a too valid assumption. Another possible such relationship is where 

Recall that the alternative is to estimate the natural replenishment for EVERY year, as variations in precipitation also induce variations in natural replenishment.
Watershed Models
Another
method often used for estimating natural replenishment, when detailed data on
precipitation are available, is the use of any of the so called Watershed
Models. The Stanford Warershed Models developed by Crawford and Linsley
(1966) may serve as an example. The Hydrocomp Simulation Program (Hydrocomp,
1968) is a more sophisticated version of this model. Many watershed models have
been developed and published since the pioneering work of Linsley and Crawford
(see a survey of such models given by Fleming, 1975, p. 190).
Like
the Stanford model, which since its first publication has gone through a large
number of development phases, most models of this kind simulate the hydrologic
cycle, using a moisture accounting procedure of one form or another. A system of
equations describes the interrelationships among the various elements of the
model. During the simulation, a running record is maintained of all moisture
entering the basin (or the considered part of it), stored in it, and leaving it
as evapotranspiration, surface runoff, and groundwater. The latter is the
natural replenishment considered here.
D. CHANGED STORAGE WITHIN THE AQUIFER
If total inflow (from all sources) exceeds total outflow, the difference is stored within the considered aquifer domain. At this point we have to make a distinction between a phreatic aquifer and a confined one.
[
Comment: The subject of water storage in an aquifer will be discussed in detail in later lectures. Here, we shall briefly introduce the subject for the purpose of completeness, without too many details.]Storage in a phreatic aquifer:
As water
accumulates in the considered portion of an aquifer, the water table rises
(similar to what happens in any vessel).
We may ask:
what is the volume of water that has to be added to storage in a phreatic
aquifer, per unit (horizontal) area, in order to cause a water table rise by one
unit (e.g., one meter). Similarly, what is the volume that has to be withdrawn
from a unit area of aquifer in order to produce a unit drop in the water table.
Water is
stored in a phreatic aquifer column of unit cross-sectional area mainly due to
the fact that water fills up the void space as the water table rises.

The above figure shows a column of (horizontal cross-sectional) area
A, and water levels at times t and t + Dt, during which the water table rises a distance Dh.
So
what is the volume that can be stored per unit horizontal area, when the water
table rises by one unit? Write your answer, and check with
The
storativity,
the volume of water,DUw , released from storage (or added to it) per unit horizontal area, A, of an aquifer and per unit decline (or rise) in the water table, Dh.


Because water
is already present in the void space as the water table rises, and water remains
in the void space as the water table drops, the specific yield is less than the
porosity, by an amount referred to as "irreducible
moisture content,
Storage in a Confined aquifer:
We have
seen above that the change in water storage in a phreatic aquifer is associated
with filling and emptying of the void space. What about a confined aquifer? How
can water be stored in the aquifer, if it is completely full with water and
remains so?
The ability
of a confined aquifer to store additional water stems from the fact that water
is slightly compressible and so is the aquifer material. Hence, water can be
added into an aquifer that is already fully saturated, causing a rise in
pressure (which means also a rise in the piezometric head).
We define storativity
of a confined aquifer,
the volume of water,DUw , released from storage (or added to it) per unit horizontal area, A, of an aquifer and per unit decline (or rise) in the piezometric head, Dh.

This relationship is shown in the figure below.
Note that
S is dimensionless.
Typical
values of storativity of a confined aquifer are of the order of 10-4
- 10-6, roughly 40% of 
Uw =
S(i) Ai Dhi Syi.
You may find more material on the components of a regional water balance in:Bear, (1979).
![]()
You are now ready to continue to the As always, you can go back to the table of You may e-mail me questions and comments.
E-mail address: cvrbear@tx.technion.ac.il
LECTURE on
TOPIC C, LECTURE 1: Darcy's Law,
where we focus our attention on the motion of water in the saturated zone.
and choose a LECTURE.
![]()
Such variations are due to the fact that the various factors that affect the relationship between precipitation and infiltration (and also surface runoff), e.g., slope, vegetation, soil type, etc., also vary spatially.
The role of the hydraulic gradient is associated with the basic idea expressed by Darcy's law, namely, that flow takes place from high to low piezometric head. Consider the case shown in the following figure:

Look at Figure (a). You see two contours:
h' and h'' (< h'). Consider point A. What is the flow, in direction and magnitude, at this point? In two-dimensional flow, it is Q' = T ¥ J, i.e. the product of the transmissivity and the hydraulic gradient. What is J here? It is the value of the difference between the piezometric heads h' and h'', divided by the distance between the two contours. This distance is normal to the two (straight-line) contours. It is the shortest distance between the two (parallel) contours. Note that AB is shorter than AC, AD, or AE. This gives the direction and magnitude of the hydraulic gradient. It is the direction and magnitude of the steepest descent in piezometric head at point A.In Figure B, in which we see curved equipotentials (i.e., curves of contours of equal piezometric head), we implement the same idea. We look for the steepest descent at A. Actually, in both cases, we have to take the average hydraulic gradient at a point which is mid-way between the two contours (i.e., between A and B). In an isotropic porous medium (i.e., one that has the same transmissivity in all directions), the direction of the hydraulic gradient is also the direction of the streamline at that point.
In other
words, to obtain flow normal to a line segment, we need the component of the
hydraulic gradient normal to that segment!
:
I am not sure, but I have a feeling that your answer is "porosity,
f". I am saying so, because in my years of teaching, this is the first answer that I usually get. It is not so bad, as it assumes that as the water table rises , the volume of water stored is equal to the void space. The ratio between volume of void space and volume of porous medium is indeed the porosity. However, this answer does not take into account the fact that the void space in the unsaturated zone is not completely free of liquid water. There is always some moisture (in the form of liquid water) in the void space, as the water table starts to rise, so that the volume required to saturate the unit volume of soil is less than the porosity. Similarly, as water is drained out, accompanied by a decline in the water table, some water remains in the void space as a result of capillary forces. We shall go into details of these phenomena at a later stage in this course. Right now, it is suffiecient that you recognize the fact stated above.The conclusion is, therefore, that the volume of water stored in the void space per unit rise of the water table is somewhat less than the porosity.
:
Although we shall learn about Darcy's law at a later stage, it seems reasonable to assume that flow takes place form high water levels to lower ones. Also, you may probably recall from your course in fluid mechanics, or hydraulics, that streamlines are perpendicular to equipotentials, a role played here by the contours.
The contours show lines of equal piezometric head. The piezometric head is defined as the energy of the water (due to elevation and pressure), per unit weight of water. Flow takes place from high energy to low energy, i.e., from a high to a low piezometric head. You'll learn all this later.
Examining the figure, we note that the statement is indeed correct.
Compare with what you thought.
![]()
You may e-mail me questions and comments.
E-mail address: cvrbear@tx.technion.ac.il